bis zur Reparatur, Folge "Veränderungen und Bug-Fixes .

[For Real WW2 feeling]

last straight line...

I checked these parameters with other sites and I specify that
and several links sites if there are fluctuations betwen the sites
(above all about penetration gun)
___________________________
> About super heavy german tanks and theirs armor.

Perhaps I am mistaken, but I doubt of that. But apparently "Elephant" have a better armor and armor angle of face than the KT ?
So, I think than in RWM the KT should exchange his “Lifeâ€

[For Real WW2 feeling]

> In your list "changesB3uk.txt" you say
"...Nashorn Hitpoints increased (300 to 500) and armor vs. 75mm canons a bit improved..."

for me not equitable (300 > 400 why not, more logical, if that... ) because...
- Nashorn (max armor 30mm/78° and high structure) 24 Ton
- StuG III B (50mm/70° > 450 Life) 22 Ton
- Hetzer (60mm/30° > 500 Life) 15 Ton
- StuG III G (80mm/69° > 550 Life) 24 Ton
for this 3 lasts, less tons but structure a lot less high too

----------------------------------
> about Life Puma
- Puma : (30mm/rounded° Gunshield - 30 mm/55°) 12 Ton = 250 Life only ?
- M8 Greyhound : (32mm/0° Gunshield - 19mm/0°) 8 Ton = 300 Life
- BA-10 : (10 mm/?°) 5 Ton = 300 Life
- BA-6 : 5 Ton = 300 Life

bye

[-Barbarossa-]

Shadock we use normal AP ammonition for nearly every tank in RWM. Range standart is 500m. U give examples with HVAP (High-Velocity-Armor-Piercing) and other ammo variants which are not standart.
So this argumentation has a lack of comparison-ability.

About hitpoints with the armoured vehicles u are right...will checkt it ..even there is no much use to change it in view of the gameplay.

[Ingwio]

Thread wurde widerhergestellt. Also könnt wieder im alten Thread posten.

Gruss General Lammers