Sudden-Strike-Maps

Barbarossa;

I notice the intrest in German and Russian units and thats fine, but I would like to see some more intrest in all nations.
Maybe a new Allied unit like this one with sandbags and higher frontal Hit Pionts. :roll:

http://i183.photobucket.com/albums/x116/tsatterlee/m36withsandbags ...

Suka hat geschrieben:nice but can u make them brighter somehow

The detail on the Stugs is hard to see also. But I appreciate all your efforts in this forum and on the Mod.

I just ran a test with thease units and with only 1 shot, the Tiger did this every time. The 88mm canon and the self propeled gun however destroyed all three with thier first shot.

The bridge is to easily damadged, and moves of of place. :(
http://i183.photobucket.com/albums/x116/tsatterlee/BridgeProblem.jpg

I find it's a template alignment problem. Couldn'nt that be fixed with a graghics program? I don't have such a program.


http://i183.photobucket.com/albums/x116 ...

Just complaining. Cracky,Crunchy trees (althought I love the sound of that one tree falling) give your possition away to the Enemy. Can something be done about that ?

This has been the problem for me all along with Windows 98 SE. No score page in menu .No back to Menu. Always Quit it's the only real option. RWM6.7-B5.

Nero hat geschrieben:Ich bin für indirektes Feuer und, wenn vorhanden, MGs als Sekundärwaffe. Einzige Ausnahme ist der Sherman 105, da dieser, soweit ich weiß, zur Stürmung von Stellungen eingesetzt wurde. Da ist direktes Feuer vielleicht doch sinnvoller.

I agree.

The number of 76mm shots it took to kill this little wooden house was "26". Thats just totaly unreal.

I ask you guys to examime the Hay piles in those screenies. Thier alive with movement. I look at maps very closely.

I see pontoon bridge in the SSF Desert scheme. Would it be to much to have it available in other schemes? Its either alter the river for shallows when you don't want to, or a bridge with the ugly stubby cliff thingys on the sides.

Is there something you can do to make unit sounds louder or quieter. Some things just don't sound right. The Churchil for example is so much quieter than the Comet. The P-47 an Stuka are very loud. I think the water shot splash is great just not loud enough ect...ect... :roll:

I just found the ...

Watchdog1 hat geschrieben:

This is like me, redundant... ...... ....
Please return M7 Priest to Longrange artilery unit.
"remember El Alamein"

This is like me, redundant... ...... ....
Please return M7 Priest to Longrange artilery unit.
"remember El Alamein"

.........

Yup, I agree the ISU should be direct fire as it was used at Kursk etc (ie- in the 'Animal Killer' tank destroyer role). The russians never really got into the whole SP artillery thing. However, I seem to remember the ISU having both direct and ballistic fire in 6.6 :? . Could be wrong though ...