more like late days!?Khamûl hat geschrieben:the archer is an tank-hunter from the early days in world war two.

dude u are funnyGeorgiSchukow hat geschrieben:Well i did make a test.
Two hills.
On one hill I put an archer.
On the other hill i put a 75mm Pak 40.
Boths targets were PzIV D
The Archer needed 3(!) direct hits,the Pak 40 just one.
mfg
GeorgiSchukow
hey i am not angry but maybe ur archer missed the pz 4 D and u thought that archer need 3 shoots to kill him! in this case is differentGeorgiSchukow hat geschrieben:Hey Adrian.
I know what an Archer was able to do IN REALITY,but i made these tests in RWM,so I am just able to say,what happened in the game.
I know,what Archer in Reality was,but we are talking about RWM,so sorry if you are not happy with my postings.I just wrote about that,what happened.
mfg
GeorgiSchukow
but earlier then the archilles and thats the important fact, i think. like the nashorn only a temporary solution and later with the archilles or the jagdpanther overhauledLamafarmer hat geschrieben:more like late days!?Khamûl hat geschrieben:the archer is an tank-hunter from the early days in world war two.
well more exact:For Real Warfare WW2 feel hat geschrieben:i tested for you...
tanks effective of face vs KT and JT
- SU-152 (zeveroboy)
- JS2
- ISU-122
- SU-100 (but less)
and sure the 17pdr (GB) and 90 mm (USA) guns are dont effective
of face, even on Elephant... only on Sturmtiger![]()
personnaly, i think than this 2 lasts should have the same effectiveness as the SU-100...
( i go verified if in reality they has a big difference ?)